Built for cases that don’t move on their own
We work on physical share, dematerialisation, and IEPF matters that require structured execution, not assumptions, shortcuts, or repeated attempts.
Why this practice exists
Many investors hold legitimate assets that remain inaccessible due to outdated records, procedural mismatches, or regulatory escalation over time.
These cases don’t fail because they are invalid.
They fail because the system requires precision, sequencing, and compliance alignment, and provides little guidance when something goes wrong.
This practice exists to bridge that gap.
What we do
We handle physical share and IEPF-related cases by identifying the exact compliance issue first, and then executing the correct process across companies, RTAs, banks, and statutory authorities.
Our work includes:
-
Dematerialisation of physical shares
-
Rectification of record mismatches (name, signature, address, KYC)
-
Transmission and succession-related cases
-
Recovery of shares and dividends transferred to IEPF
Each case is handled based on its current regulatory position, not a generic checklist.
What we are not
We are not a document collection service.
We are not a filing-only intermediary.
We do not rely on trial-and-error submissions.
Cases move forward only when submissions are aligned with what the authority will accept, not with what seems reasonable to the investor.
How we work
We operate as a compliance-led execution partner.
This means:
-
Understanding how RTAs and authorities evaluate submissions
-
Following prescribed formats, attestations, and sequencing
-
Coordinating across institutions until each stage is formally completed
We work within regulatory frameworks as they exist, not as they should be.
Our approach to credibility
In this domain, credibility is not visibility or volume.
It is accuracy, follow-through, and restraint.
We structure cases so that:
-
Only the required documents are submitted
-
Submissions are made in the correct order
-
Progress is tracked at each formal stage
This is what allows cases to move forward, even after years of delay.
Transparency in engagement
Cases progress in phases.
Fees and timelines are linked to execution stages, not promises.
We communicate:
-
What stage the case is currently in
-
What is required next
-
What depends on third-party timelines
No assumptions. No guarantees beyond what the process allows.
If you want to understand the issues before engaging: